<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blueandbrownbooks.com/2008/04/10/intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blueandbrownbooks.com/2008/04/10/intellectual-property/</link>
	<description>is (or are) a series of notes and informal discussions about ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Privacy and/in Property at blue and brown books</title>
		<link>http://blueandbrownbooks.com/2008/04/10/intellectual-property/#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy and/in Property at blue and brown books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueandbrownbooks.com/?p=227#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>[...] reference to the previous discussion of Intellectual Property, this is not to be confused as an argument of art being for art&#8217;s sake. Keeping in mind that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reference to the previous discussion of Intellectual Property, this is not to be confused as an argument of art being for art&#8217;s sake. Keeping in mind that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San</title>
		<link>http://blueandbrownbooks.com/2008/04/10/intellectual-property/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blueandbrownbooks.com/?p=227#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>This is such an interesting idea. It really is the debate of the internet isn't it? I am not sure exactly where I stand on this. I get why people should make money from their art. All of us have to, whether we like it or not, have a way of making money to survive. It seems only fair that if art is what they do best then they should be allowed to do that. I agree that hardworking bands who do the concert thing should make money, but does that necessarily mean that musicians shouldn't be able to make money from selling their songs? I think, no. In Korea, the recording industry is in major difficulties. Every Korean seems to be a pirate. Hell, I have a lot of Korean music on my harddrive that was never paid for. I pretty much couldn't find a place to buy it even if I wanted to. So... in order to make money, bands and groups have to tour, appear on tv and endorse things. What I have noticed is that the quality of Korean music has dropped. The bands making all the money now are the dance/hip hop groups. The serious indy bands are out alone and without the support of a traditional record label (albeit a seriously outdated model) this kind of music is vanishing... What I do like is the Radiohead / NiN model where you pay the artist directly. I paid nothing for Radiohead (they owe me for all the money I laid down in the past!) but I am sure they made money from it. 
Other arts are in more difficulties. I would love to make money from my photos. I would love to give up my job so that I could do only that, but with the idea you are talking, I would never have that chance. 
My thoughts aren't fully formed, but I think I pretty much disagree with you.... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such an interesting idea. It really is the debate of the internet isn&#8217;t it? I am not sure exactly where I stand on this. I get why people should make money from their art. All of us have to, whether we like it or not, have a way of making money to survive. It seems only fair that if art is what they do best then they should be allowed to do that. I agree that hardworking bands who do the concert thing should make money, but does that necessarily mean that musicians shouldn&#8217;t be able to make money from selling their songs? I think, no. In Korea, the recording industry is in major difficulties. Every Korean seems to be a pirate. Hell, I have a lot of Korean music on my harddrive that was never paid for. I pretty much couldn&#8217;t find a place to buy it even if I wanted to. So&#8230; in order to make money, bands and groups have to tour, appear on tv and endorse things. What I have noticed is that the quality of Korean music has dropped. The bands making all the money now are the dance/hip hop groups. The serious indy bands are out alone and without the support of a traditional record label (albeit a seriously outdated model) this kind of music is vanishing&#8230; What I do like is the Radiohead / NiN model where you pay the artist directly. I paid nothing for Radiohead (they owe me for all the money I laid down in the past!) but I am sure they made money from it.<br />
Other arts are in more difficulties. I would love to make money from my photos. I would love to give up my job so that I could do only that, but with the idea you are talking, I would never have that chance.<br />
My thoughts aren&#8217;t fully formed, but I think I pretty much disagree with you&#8230;. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
